Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Chattisgarh High Court

Smt. Kamla Netam vs State Of Chhattisgarh on 6 April, 2017

Author: Prashant Kumar Mishra

Bench: Prashant Kumar Mishra

                                                                 NAFR

        HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR

                         WPS No. 1607 of 2017

     • Smt. Kamla Netam W/o Late Shri Devsingh Netam, Aged About
       62 Years R/o Village Pendari, Post Kalagpur, Tahsil and P. S.
       Gundardehi, District Balod (Chhattisgarh).

                                                         ---- Petitioner

                                Versus

     1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Home Affairs,
        Police Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Mantralaya, District
        Raipur (Chhattisgarh).

     2. The Secretary, Finance, Home Affairs, Mahanadi Bhawan, New
        Mantralaya Raipur (Chhattisgarh).

     3. The Director General of Police, (Home Guards) Mana, District
        Raipur (Chhattisgarh).

     4. Joint Director, Treasury Accounts and Pension, Jagdalpur,
        District Bastar (Chhattisgarh).

                                                      ---- Respondents

For Petitioner Shri Rakesh Anthony, Advocate For Respondent-State Shri Shashank Thakur, GA Hon'ble Shri Justice Prashant Kumar Mishra Order On Board 06/04/2017

1. At the very outset, learned counsel for the parties would submit that the matter has already been considered by this Court in WP(S) No.4523/2014 (Francis Xavier Beck and others vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others and other connected matters) and WP (S) No.1975/2015 (A.P. Tripathi and others vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others and other connected matters) and final orders have been passed in the said matters on 03.07.2015 and 16.07.2015 respectively, therefore, the present writ petition may be disposed of in terms of Francis Xavier Beck (supra) and A.P. Tripathi (supra).

2. In view of the aforesaid submission made by the learned counsel for the parties, the writ petition is disposed of in terms of Francis Xavier Beck (supra) and A.P. Tripathi (supra).

Sd/-

JUDGE PRASHANT KUMAR MISHRA Nirala