Punjab-Haryana High Court
Pushpa Kumari vs Preeti And Ors on 18 August, 2022
Author: Arvind Singh Sangwan
Bench: Arvind Singh Sangwan
TA No.907 of 2022 (O&M)
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT
CHANDIGARH
TA No.907 of 2022 (O&M)
Date of decision: 18.08.2022
Pushpa Kumari
....Petitioner
Versus
Preeti and Others
....Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN
Present: Mr. B.S. Bhalla, Advocate
for the petitioner.
ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN J. (Oral)
Prayer in this petition is for transfer of the Civil Suit No.1516 of 2022 titled as "Preeti vs Pushpa Kumari, etc.", pending in the Court of Civil Judge (Jr. Division), Jalandhar to the competent Court of jurisdiction at Moga.
Counsel for the petitioner has argued that vide order dated 10.08.2022 passed in TA No.885 of 2022, the petition filed under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act by the respondent/husband in Family Court, Camp Court Phagwara, District Kapurthala, was transferred to Moga by passing the following order:-
"Counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that the respondent/husband has filed the petition under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, as a counter-blast, before the Principal Judge, Family Court, Camp Court Phagwara, District Kapurthala.
Counsel for the petitioner has also argued that on account of a petition filed by the respondent/husband, the petitioner is facing great difficulty in prosecuting the said case as there is a distance of about 100 Kms from Moga to Camp Court Phagwara, District Kapurthala.
Counsel for the petitioner has further contended that the petitioner is having a minor child, who is living in her care and 1 of 5 ::: Downloaded on - 19-08-2022 14:48:21 ::: TA No.907 of 2022 (O&M) 2 custody and she is facing difficulty to defend the case as she has to travel from Moga to Camp Court Phagwara, District Kapurthala.
Counsel for the petitioner has relied upon the judgments "Sumita Singh vs Kumar Sanjay", 2002 SC 396 and "Rajani Kishor Pardeshi vs Kishor Babulal Pardeshi", 2005(12) SCC 237, wherein the Hon'ble Supreme Court has observed that while deciding the transfer application, the Courts are required to give more weightage and consideration to the convenience of the female litigants and transfer of legal proceedings from one Court to another should ordinarily be allowed, taking into consideration their convenience and the Courts should desist from putting female litigants under undue hardships."
Counsel for the petitioner has also relied upon the judgment "N.C.V. Aishwarya vs A.S. Saravana Karthik Sha,"
2022 Live Law (SC) 627, wherein the Hon'ble Supreme Court has observed as under:-
9. The cardinal principle for exercise of power under section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure is that the ends of justice should demand the transfer of the suit, appeal or other proceeding. In matrimonial matters, wherever Courts are called upon to consider the plea of transfer, the Courts have to take into consideration the economic soundness of both the parties, the social strata of the spouses and their behavioural pattern, their standard of life prior to the marriage and subsequent thereto and the circumstances of both the parties in eking out their livelihood and under whose protective umbrella they are seeking their sustenance to life. Given the prevailing socioeconomic paradigm in the Indian society, generally, it is the wife's convenience which must be looked at while considering transfer.
10. Further, when two or more proceedings are pending in different Courts between the same parties which raise common question of fact and law, and when the decisions in the cases are interdependent, it is desirable that they should be tried together by the same Judge so as to avoid multiplicity in trial of the same issues and conflict of decisions."
It is well settled that while considering the transfer of a matrimonial dispute/case at the instance of the wife, the Court is 2 of 5 ::: Downloaded on - 19-08-2022 14:48:21 ::: TA No.907 of 2022 (O&M) 3 to consider the family condition of the wife, the custody of the minor child, economic condition of the wife, her physical health and earning capacity of the husband and most important the convenience of the wife i.e. she cannot travel alone without assistance of a male member of her family, connectivity of the place to and fro from her place of residence as well as bearing of the litigation charges and travelling expenses.
After hearing the counsel for the petitioner, considering the fact that issuance of notice to the respondent has the consequences of staying further proceedings before the trial Court, otherwise the petitioner/wife will have to bear the litigation expenses and transportation expenses and in case, notice of motion is issued, even the respondent/husband has to bear the litigation expenses and in view of the judgments i.e. Sumita Singh's case (supra), Rajani Kishor Pardeshi's case (supra) and N.C.V. Aishwarya's case (supra) passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, this Court deem it appropriate to allow the present petition, subject to the following conditions:-
1. The petition filed under Section 9 of the Hindu Marriage Act, pending before the Family Court, Camp Court Phagwara, District Kapurthala will be transferred to the competent Court of jurisdiction at Moga.
2. The District Judge, Moga, will assign the said petition to the competent Court of jurisdiction.
3. The Family Court, Camp Court Phagwara, District Kapurthala is directed to transfer all the record pertaining to the aforesaid case to District Judge, Moga.
4. The parties are directed to appear before the trial Court, Moga, within a period of 01 month from today.
However, liberty is granted to the respondent to revive this petition, if he intent to contest the same, provided that:-
(a) The respondent will clear all arrears of maintenance amount, if any, in terms of a petition filed by the petitioner either under Section 125 Cr.P.C. or Section 12 of the Domestic Violence Act or Section 24 of the Hindu Marriage Act.
(b) The respondent will file an affidavit giving undertaking to pay Rs.1,000/- per day, to the petitioner for attending the Court proceedings at
3 of 5 ::: Downloaded on - 19-08-2022 14:48:21 ::: TA No.907 of 2022 (O&M) 4 Camp Court Phagwara, District Kapurthala, on each and every date of hearing.
(c) The respondent will bring a demand draft of Rs.25,000/- towards the litigation expenses of the petitioner to pursue the case at Camp Court Phagwara, District Kapurthala in case the respondent opt to contest this petition.
Disposed of."
Counsel for the petitioner has further submitted that in order to further harass the petitioner/wife now the sister-in-law i.e. husband's sister namely Preeti has filed the civil suit praying for recovery to be assessed by the Court as damages/compensation on account of unwarranted litigation and the said suit is pending before the Civil Judge (Jr. Division), Jalandhar. It is also argued that filing of this civil suit is an off-shoot of the matrimonial litigation already pending between the petitioner and her husband - Amit and filing of this suit is nothing but a pressure tactic upon the petitioner/wife.
Counsel for the petitioner has also argued that on account of a petition filed by the respondent/husband, the petitioner is facing great difficulty in prosecuting the said case as there is a distance of about 100 Kms from Moga to Jalandhar.
Counsel for the petitioner has further contended that the petitioner is having a minor child, who is living in her care and custody and she is facing difficulty to defend the case as she has to travel from Moga to Jalandhar.
After hearing the counsel for the petitioner, considering the fact that issuance of notice to the respondent has the consequences of staying further proceedings before the trial Court, otherwise the petitioner/wife will have to bear the litigation expenses and 4 of 5 ::: Downloaded on - 19-08-2022 14:48:21 ::: TA No.907 of 2022 (O&M) 5 transportation expenses and in case, notice of motion is issued, even the respondent/husband has to bear the litigation expenses and in view of the judgments i.e. Sumita Singh's case (supra), Rajani Kishor Pardeshi's case (supra) and N.C.V. Aishwarya's case (supra) passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court, this Court deem it appropriate to allow the present petition, subject to the following conditions:-
1. The Civil Suit No.1516 of 2022 titled as "Preeti vs Pushpa Kumari, etc.", pending before the Court of Civil Judge (Jr. Division), Jalandhar will be transferred to the competent Court of jurisdiction at Moga.
2. The District Judge, Moga, will assign the said petition to the competent Court of jurisdiction.
3. The Civil Judge (Jr. Division), Jalandhar is directed to transfer all the record pertaining to the aforesaid case to District Judge, Moga.
4. The parties are directed to appear before the trial Court, Moga, within a period of 01 month from today.
5. The Court concerned, where the litigation pending between the parties, will accommodate them with one date in one calendar month.
Disposed of.
(ARVIND SINGH SANGWAN)
JUDGE
18.08.2022
yakub Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No
Whether reportable: Yes/No
5 of 5
::: Downloaded on - 19-08-2022 14:48:21 :::