Legal Document View

Unlock Advanced Research with PRISMAI

- Know your Kanoon - Doc Gen Hub - Counter Argument - Case Predict AI - Talk with IK Doc - ...
Upgrade to Premium
[Cites 1, Cited by 0]

Punjab-Haryana High Court

Neeraj Kumar & Ors vs State Of Haryana & Ors on 3 March, 2016

Author: Deepak Sibal

Bench: Deepak Sibal

                        119

                                IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA
                                              AT CHANDIGARH

                                                           CWP No.4314 of 2016
                                                           Date of Decision: 03.03.2016


                        Neeraj Kumar and others
                                                                             . . . Petitioners

                                                       Versus

                        State of Haryana and others
                                                                           . . . Respondents



                        CORAM:     HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK SIBAL


                        Present:   Mr. Narender Kumar Sharma, Advocate
                                   for the petitioners.

                                                        *****

                        Deepak Sibal, J. (Oral)

Notice of motion.

Mr. Harish Rathee, Senior DAG, Haryana, who is present in Court, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.

The petitioners were appointed as Sweeper-cum- Attendant on contract basis under the National Health Mission. Though, the scheme under which the petitioners had been appointed continues till 31.03.2016, they have been issued notice to the effect that their services would be terminated mid-way i.e. with effect from 04.03.2016. It is that notice which has been challenged before this Court through the present petition. SACHIN SHARMA 2016.03.09 14:36 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh 2 CWP No.4314 of 2016

Mr. Harish Rathee, Senior DAG, Haryana, states that petitioners' case would also be covered as per the statement made by him on behalf of the State in CWP No.20558 of 2015 titled as ;Rina Rani and others vs. State of Haryana and others', decided on 17.02.2016 and resultantly, the petitioners would be allowed to continue as Sweeper-cum-Attendant, the post on which they are working till 31.03.2016 i.e. the date till the scheme is in operation. It is further submitted that they would be paid salary till 31.03.2016.

The aforementioned statement made on behalf of the State satisfies the learned counsel for the petitioners. On such expression of satisfaction, the present petition has been rendered infructuous.

Ordered accordingly.

[ DEEPAK SIBAL ] JUDGE 03.03.2016 sachin SACHIN SHARMA 2016.03.09 14:36 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document Chandigarh