Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

PROF. M. RAMADASS (PONDICHERRY) : Mr. Speaker, Sir, I want to make a brief submission on this matter and associate myself with the matter.

SHRI A. KRISHNASWAMY (SRIPERUMBUDUR) : Mr. Speaker, Sir, I also want to associate myself with this matter and want to say a few words.

MR. SPEAKER : You have not given notice. I am sorry. All those hon. Members who want to associate themselves with this matter can send slips to the Table. Their names will be recorded as associating with this matter. There will be a full debate on this matter and you can give notices for that.

PROF. M. RAMADASS : Sir, in the BAC meeting you said that only the debate on inflation would be taken up.

MR. SPEAKER : That does not mean you will not give notice and stand up here.[R5]  … (Interruptions)

 

MR. SPEAKER: Please record the names of the hon. Members who want to associate.

 

SHRI B. MAHTAB (CUTTACK): Sir, the long awaited judicial Pronouncement ends the agonizing uncertainty over the fate of the quota system. It has legitimized the very concept of reservation for certain sections of the society.  This will open up better opportunities for the OBCs to pursue higher education.  But unfortunately, the ruling of the Apex court is not the last word on the many contentious questions raised by the adoption of the Ninety-Third Amendment enabling the Government to reserve the seats for OBCs, the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes in educational institutions.