Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

i. Swapnil Baban Shinde v State of Maharashtra and Ors 1.

ii. Ashvini Ramchandra Bhogam v State of Maharashtra and Ors2.

iii. Apoorva d/o Vinay Nichale v Divisional Caste Certificate Scrutiny Committee No.1 and Ors.3 .

14) The first decision relied upon by the Petitioner is the Order of remand passed by this Court. This Court had referred to a translation of record in Modi script of the years 1918, and 1927 of village Marunji relied upon by the Petitioner in support of his case that those documents were of his cognate ancestors showing their caste as "Kunbi". Hence, this Court had directed Respondent No. 2 to conduct a fresh inquiry into Petitioner's claim of his origin through his cognate ancestors from village Marunji and immediate ancestors in village Kasar Amboli. A perusal of the impugned Order shows that Respondent No. 2 discarded the first two vigilance report as they were not in conformity with the directions issued by this Court in the Order of remand. However, Respondent No. 2 relied upon only the third report after being satisfied that the Vigilance Cell had followed the directions issued by this Court. Thus, by relying upon the third report of the Vigilance Cell, Respondent No. 2 has held that the Petitioner was not 2 2017(2) Mh.L.J. 3 2010(6) Mh.L.J 903-wp-2742-2023.doc able to prove the geanology relied upon by him.