Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

cheque no. 501707 dated 20.09.2015 in the sum of ₹6 lakhs and cheque no. 501708 dated 01.09.2015 in the sum of ₹6 lakhs.

5 It is stated that the defendant kept requesting the plaintiff to not present the cheques and consequently, one cheque became outdated and later, the other was dishonoured with the remarks "insufficient funds." It is stated that the plaintiff sent a legal notice to the defendant but he did not return his money. 6 It is stated that the plaintiff then filed a criminal complaint case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act in which the defendant admitted that he had taken ₹10.25 lakhs from the plaintiff's son as the sale consideration of the property but the said deal was cancelled. It is stated that the defendant also admitted his liability to pay ₹1.75 lakhs, however, he falsely CS No. 484/2017 Darshan Lal Nagpal vs Anil Sharma Page no. 2/19 claimed that it was on account of some money dispute. It is stated that the defendant falsely claimed in the criminal case that he agreed to pay ₹4.5 lakhs more and transferred this total amount of ₹14.75 lakhs in the account of the plaintiff's wife from the account of M/s The Event Manager in instalments from 11.02.2013 to 21.03.2013. It is stated that the defendant falsely claimed that the two cheques were security cheques, which were not returned to him after the repayment.