Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: 9b explosive act in Nasreen Bano vs State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of ... on 24 January, 2024Matching Fragments
1. Counter affidavit filed by the learned A.G.A. is taken on record.
As per the counter affidavit filed by the learned A.G.A., notice has already been served on private respondents, but none has put in appearance on their behalf.
2. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned A.G.A. for the State.
3. The present appeal has been filed under Section 14-A (2) of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Act, 1989 against the impugned order dated 13.12.2023 passed by Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Raebareli in Bail Application No. 4014 of 2023 arising out of F.I.R. No. 351 of 2023, under Sections 286, 304 I.P.C., Section 5/9B of Explosives Act and Section 3(2)(v) of SC/ST Act, P.S. Sareni, District Raebareli.
7. In view of above facts and circumstances as also keeping in view the fact that the trial of the case is not likely to be concluded in near future, the appeal has substance and it is accordingly, allowed.
8. Impugned order dated 13.12.2023 passed by Special Judge, SC/ST Act, Raebareli in Bail Application No. 4014 of 2023 arising out of F.I.R. No. 351 of 2023, under Sections 286, 304 I.P.C., Section 5/9B of Explosives Act and Section 3(2)(v) of SC/ST Act, P.S. Sareni, District Raebareli is hereby set aside.