Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

11. No other point was urged.

12. The appeal is dismissed. Judgment and decree of the lower appellate court are affirmed. However, to save the appellant from the peril of sudden ejectment, it is directed that the decree for ejectment shall not be available for execution until 30-6-1993 subject to the appellant filing an undertaking on affidavit before the executing Court within a period of two weeks from today to the following effect :--

(i) That on or before 30-6-1993, he shall hand over vacant and peaceful possession over the suit accommodation to the plaintiff/ respondents and shall not in between induct anyone else in the suit accommodation.
(ii) Within a month, he shall deposit the entire money part of the decree with the executing Court for payment to the landlord, including rent in arrears up-to-date and shall thereafter continue to deposit month by month, by the 15th day of each month, the rent currently falling in arrears.
(iii) Failing the filing of the undertaking or failing compliance with any of the conditions abovesaid, the decree for ejectment shall become available for execution forthwith.

13. Looking to the nature of controversy arising for decision in the appeal, costs before this Court are left to be borne by the parties as incurred. Counsel's fee as per schedule, if certified.