Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: 2011) 11 scc 275 in Mohan Singh Rathore vs Dhannjay Rao Jadhav on 30 August, 2019Matching Fragments
The Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of K.K. Velusamy vs N. THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH ( Mohan Singh Rathore vs. Dhannjay Rao Jadhav & Ors.) Palanisamy, reported in (2011) 11 SCC 275 has observed as under:-
"9. There is no specific provision in the Code enabling the parties to re- open the evidence for the purpose of further examination-in-chief or cross- examination. Section 151 of the Code provides that nothing in the Code shall be deemed to limit or otherwise affect the inherent powers of the Code to make such orders as may be necessary for the ends of justice or to prevent the abuse of the process of the court. In the absence of any provision providing for re-opening of evidence or recall of any witness for further examination or cross-examination, for purposes other than securing clarification required by the court, the inherent power under section 151 of the Code, subject to its limitations, can be invoked in appropriate cases to re- open the evidence and/or recall witnesses for further examination. This inherent power of the court is not affected by the express power conferred upon the court under Order 18 Rule 17 of the Code to recall any witness to enable the court to put such question to elicit any clarifications."