Document Fragment View
Fragment Information
Showing contexts for: 376 493 in Shivanshu Singh @ Satyam Singh vs State Of U.P. And 3 Others on 28 July, 2025Matching Fragments
1. Heard Sri Rishabh Agrawal (AoR No. A/R 0944/21) holding brief of Sri Vinayak Mithal, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Amit Tandon, learned counsel for opposite party no.4 as well as Shri S.K. Singh, learned A.G.A.
2. This is an application U/S 482 of the Cr.P.C. preferred by the applicant is to quash the charge sheet dated 13.04.2018, under Sections 376, 493, 506, 504 IPC in case crime no.37 of 2018, Police Station-Sector 24, NOIDA, District Gautam Budh Nagar as well as the summoning order dated 30.11.2018 in Criminal Misc. Case No.7957 of 2018 (State vs. Satyam Singh@Shivanshu Singh) arising out of case crime no.37 of 2018 under Sections 376, 493, 506, 504 IPC, Police Station-Sector 24, NOIDA pending before learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.1, Gautam Budh Nagar.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that a first information report stood lodged by the opposite party No. 4 against the applicant under Sections 376, 493, 506, 504 IPC being FIR No. 0037 of 2018. Thereafter post recording of the statements under Sections 161 and 164 Cr.P.C., a charge-sheet came to be submitted against the applicant under Sections 376, 493, 506, 504 IPC on 13.04.2018 summoning the applicant on 30.11.2018. The same was subject matter of challenge by the applicant by means of the present application, wherein this Court on 09.04.2019 proceeded to pass the following orders:
"Heard Sri Vinayak Mithal, learned counsel for the applicant, Ms. Shaivya Agarwal, learned counsel for opposite party no.4 as well as learned A.G.A.
By means of the present application, the prayer sought by the applicant is to quash the charge sheet dated 13.04.2018, summoning order dated 30.11.2018 as well as entire proceeding of Criminal Misc. Case No.7957 of 2018(State vs. Satyam Singh@Shivanshu Singh) arising out of case crime no.37 of 2018 under Sections 376, 493, 506, 504 IPC, Police Station-Sector 24, NOIDA pending before learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.1, Gautam Budh Nagar.
8. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and gone through the records carefully.
9. Apparently, a first information report stood lodged against the applicant by the opposite party No. 4 under Sections 376, 493, 506, 504 IPC which on investigation culminated into a charge-sheet under Sections 376, 493, 506, 504 IPC. Thereafter an interim order came to be passed and post passing of the order by this Court, the compromised stood verified.
10. In Madhukar and Others (supra), the Hon'ble Apex Court held as under: