Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

New Sessions Case Number : 57211/2016.

Old Sessions Case Number : 245/2013.

First Information Report Number : 176/2013. Police Station Kirti Nagar.

Under sections 354 A/354B/509/34 of the Indian Penal Code and under sections 7/11/12 of the POCSO Act.

State versus Mr.Naman Arora. -:: Page 2 of 13 ::- 

-:: 3 ::-

3. The name, age and particulars of both the prosecutrix are mentioned in the file at serial numbers 1 and 2 in the list of prosecution witnesses and are withheld to protect their identities and both the prosecutrix are in hereinafter addressed as Ms.R and Ms. Y respectively, fictitious identities given to them. Fictitious identity of Ms.S.K. is given to the mother of the prosecutrix Ms.R whose name and particulars are mentioned at serial no. 3 in the list of prosecution witnesses. She the maternal aunt/mausi of the second prosecutrix i.e. Ms.Y whose particulars are mentioned at serial no. 2 in the list of prosecution witnesses. The name and particulars of Ms.S.K. are also withheld in order to protect the identities of both the prosecutrix i.e Ms. R and Ms. Y.

New Sessions Case Number : 57211/2016.

Old Sessions Case Number : 245/2013.

First Information Report Number : 176/2013. Police Station Kirti Nagar.

Under sections 354 A/354B/509/34 of the Indian Penal Code and under sections 7/11/12 of the POCSO Act.

State versus Mr.Naman Arora. -:: Page 3 of 13 ::- 

-:: 4 ::-

6. In order to prove its case, the prosecution has examined as many as (04) witnesses i.e. HC Hari Ram, who has recorded the formal FIR of case, as PW1; the prosecutrix Ms.R, as PW2; Ms.Y, the second prosecutrix, who is the cousin sister of the prosecutrix Ms.R, as PW3; and Ms.S.K, mother of the prosecutrix Ms.R, as PW4.

Old Sessions Case Number : 245/2013.

First Information Report Number : 176/2013. Police Station Kirti Nagar.

Under sections 354 A/354B/509/34 of the Indian Penal Code and under sections 7/11/12 of the POCSO Act.

State versus Mr.Naman Arora. -:: Page 10 of 13 ::-

-:: 11 ::-

25.Consequently, no inference can be drawn that the accused Mr.Naman Arora is guilty of the charged offences under section 354 A of the IPC read with section 34 of the IPC, under section 8 of the POCSO Act read with section 34 of the IPC and under section 12 of the POCSO Act read with section 34 of the IPC.

Old Sessions Case Number : 245/2013.

First Information Report Number : 176/2013. Police Station Kirti Nagar.

Under sections 354 A/354B/509/34 of the Indian Penal Code and under sections 7/11/12 of the POCSO Act.

State versus Mr.Naman Arora. -:: Page 11 of 13 ::-

-:: 12 ::-
offences.

28.Therefore, in view of above discussion, the conscience of this Court is completely satisfied that the prosecution has failed to bring home the charge against accused Mr.Naman Arora for the offences under section 354 A of the IPC read with section 34 of the IPC, under section 8 of the POCSO Act read with section 34 of the IPC and under section 12 of the POCSO Act read with section 34 of the IPC.