Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

9. The car belonging to the son of A1 was seized by the police as pointed out by the victim, as one in which she was forcibly taken. The evidence of DW-1, Joint RTO, shows that the said car was taken delivery on 18.03.2011 and registered on 25.03.2011. DW-2 & DW-5 are the son and connected cases daughter-in-law of A1, whose evidence indicate that they resided along with A1,his wife and another son. DW-4's deposition was read out to impress upon us that he is a pious man who regularly takes penance for the pilgrimage to Sabarimala. Reliance was placed on - Bhimapa Chandappa Hosamani v. State of Karnataka [(2007) 1 SCC (Cri) 456], Rai Sandeep v. State (NCT of Delhi)[(2012) 8 SCC 21], Krishan Kumar Malik v. State of Haryana [(2011) 3 SCC (Cri) 61], Santosh Prasad @ Santosh Kumar v. State of Bihar [(2020) 3 SCC 443] and Royson v. State of Kerala [2017 KHC 1056 ].