Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

% 13.07.2022 This writ petition has been preferred by the petitioners constrained by the fact that the Board which had been moved in an appeal pursuant to adverse orders made by the Maharashtra Medical Council against them had not considered the prayer for placing the order impugned in that appeal in abeyance.

Mr. Singhdev, learned counsel appearing for the Commission has drawn the attention of the Court to the order passed by the Court in Dr. Sandeep Bhagat Vs. Delhi Medical Council & Anr. [W.P.(C)10212/2022] where upon noticing the judgement rendered by the Bombay High Court in Dr. Ashok Vs. National Medical Commission [Writ Petition No. 589/2021], the Court had proceeded to dispose of that writ petition in the following terms:-

"2. Mr. T. Singhdev, learned counsel appearing for the Commission, on the other hand, has drawn the attention of the Court to a recent decision rendered by the Bombay High Court in Dr. Ashok Vs. National Medical Commission [Writ Petition No. 589/2021] and submits that the said High Court has recognised an incidental power inhering in the Board to consider the grant of stay in appeals that may be preferred before it. The Court notes the following fundamental principles which were laid down in the aforesaid decision:-

3. Mr. Singhdev has submitted that in light of the aforesaid decision, the Board has been taking up for consideration applications for stay that are placed before it.

4. Consequently, and in light of the above, the petition along with the pending application shall stand disposed of with the following directions:-