Document Fragment View

Matching Fragments

5. During the hearing the respondent state that in compliance with the directions of the FAA, the CPIO vide his letter No. 1536/RTI Cell/Outer District dated 19.3.2012 informed the appellant as follows: "Point No. (a) and (b): As per report of SHO-South Rohini, it is submitted that a quarrel took place between you and your neighbour Smt. Lata over a trivial issue of taking of bricks. Smt. Lata alleged that in the quarrel you intentionally outraged her modesty and caused injury to her and on the statement of Smt. Lata Devi a case FIR No. 238/10, u/s 323/354 IPC was registered at PS South-Rohini in which you were an accused. You are arrested in the case and were released on bail. Later you gave two applications regarding threatening being given by Smt. Lata. Both the complaints were attached with the case file and no separate FIR was registered on your complaints as the matter was related to the same incident".

6. The Commission is of the view that the CPIO has provided requisite reply to the appellant. No action is called for on the part of the Commission.

(Sushma Singh) Information Commissioner Authenticated true copy:

(K.K. Sharma) OSD & Deputy Registrar Address of the parties:
Shri Tarun S/O Shri Madan Lal, House No. 407, Pocket-5, Sector-2, Rohini, Delhi-110085.