this
Court either before this Court or before the CAT,
the contempt Court could not have been concluded
that there was a strict compliance ... contempt proceedings No.170/00057/2017 dated
21.03.2018 is hereby set aside.
11. While disposing of the contempt
proceedings on merits, the CAT
leading to
both the Petitioners filing contempt petitions before the CAT. While these
contempt petitions were pending, the GNCTD filed W.P.(C) 5235/2016 ... said order of the CAT.
25. Although the order dated 15th September, 2016 of the CAT dismissing
the Petitioners‟ contempt petitions could be viewed
Central Administrative
Tribunal, Bengaluru, (for short 'the CAT') in
Contempt Application No.170/00033/2018. By
the said order, the CAT has permitted ... learned Central Government
:4:
Standing Counsel jointly submit that the
contempt proceedings before the CAT have been
closed by order dated 29.01.2020.
4. Shri Mrutyunjay
Letter dated 18.03.2019 stated supra, is reproduced
hereunder:
CONTEMPT PETITION IN OP(CAT) NOs. 271/2016 AND 213/2017 FILED BY
SHRI ME UTHAMAKURUP ... discussion, we are of the view that
there is no contempt, much less, willful contempt on the part
instead of challenging
the said order, the respondent has moved CAT for
initiation of contempt proceedings against the
petitioners herein. The impugned order dated ... inconsonance with Umadevi
6
judgment and judgment of the CAT. Therefore, CAT
called upon the respondents therein to personally
be present to show cause
contempt case was
numbered as Criminal Contempt Petition No.290/2019 by this Tribunal. The
draft charge, as provided under the Contempt of Courts (CAT ... that the matter falls under Rule 13 (b) of the
Contempt of Courts (CAT) Rules, 1992. Since we were satisfied that a
prima facie case
grant such benefits, Munni Devi filed
OA No. 4273/2014 in the CAT. In the said OA she relied on the decision
dated 25th April ... Page 3 of 20
7. Munni Devi preferred Contempt Petition (CP) No.795/2015 in the CAT.
However, it was dismissed by the CAT
KPSC during the pendency
of the Contempt Petition before this Court. In the
original application filed before the CAT, interim order
was granted ... Contempt Petitions before this Court that the
applicants approached the CAT. The CAT which
ultimately held that the KAT had a jurisdiction to
dispose
disobedience of the directions
3
O.P.(CAT).No.113/2020
issued by this Court, a contempt case was filed. Initially, the Tribunal
by order ... casual labour.
9. Accordingly, the contempt petition is dismissed.
Notices discharged."
3. Before the contempt court, the contention of the petitioner
was that
service of the
Department, he had subjected himself to the
O.P(CAT) No.322/2019
14
enquiry and on his being exonerated he joined ... date of
selection.
The Original Petition (CAT) would stand
dismissed. It is submitted that a contempt
proceedings is pending before the Tribunal. We
direct
