Mr.Kanwar Udai Bhan Singh Sehrawat vs Delhi Development Authority on 9 July, 2010
common order.
File No.CIC/LS/A/2010/000832 :-
2. It is the submission of the appellant that he was allotted Plot No. 7, Block
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 20 (0.70 seconds)Mr. Surinder Puri vs Mcd on 25 March, 2010
This area is over four times the size of
the plot of the owner, which indicates a possible encroachment. When the Commission
Page ... appeared
to be over at least four times the area of the plot as per as the MCD's record, they had
shown
Mr.R K Goel vs Ut Of Chandigarh on 27 December, 2010
same matter, it has been
decided to dispose them of through a common order.
2. The matter is called for hearing today dated ... Station Fire Officer,
Chandigarh.
3. The matter, in nut shell, is that plot NO 105, Industrial Area, Phase-
II, Chandigarh, belonging to the appellant
Mr.Pankaj Bansal vs Mcd, Gnct Delhi on 6 December, 2010
builder had extended the building on both the sides of the plot on to front road as well as back lane by
almost 3 feet ... structure.
7. While constructing the flats the builder had encroached upon the common space on which the owner of B-
12 had no ownership. What
Mr.Pankaj Bansal vs Mcd, Gnct Delhi on 12 October, 2010
builder had extended the building on both the sides of the plot on to front road as well as back lane by
almost 3 feet ... structure.
7. While constructing the flats the builder had encroached upon the common space on which the owner of B-
12 had no ownership. What
Mr.Ranjan Kumar Pal vs Ministry Of Labour And Employment on 16 December, 2010
Mr.Ranjan Kumar Pal vs Ministry Of Labour And Employment on 16 December, 2010
CENTRAL
Mr.Preeti Goyal vs Ut Of Chandigarh on 16 September, 2010
Bank. It has, therefore, been decided to dispose
them of through a common order.
2. The matter is called for hearing today dated ... Harkamal Singh or M/s Bhag Furniture on the
following address :-
(a) Plot No. 92/4, VPO - Maloya, Chandigarh(UT)
(b) House
Mr. Satinder Singh Bawa vs Municipal Corporation Of Delhi on 19 January, 2010
Mr. Satinder Singh Bawa vs Municipal Corporation Of Delhi on 19 January, 2010
CENTRAL INFORMATION
Mr.T Sekar vs General Insurance Corporation Of India on 28 September, 2010
Mr.T Sekar vs General Insurance Corporation Of India on 28 September, 2010
Central Information
Mr.Gurjeet Singh vs Mcd, Gnct Delhi on 2 June, 2010
additional safety norms have to be
followed if the building shares a common boundary wall with an adjacent building.
Public Information Officer ... appellant
was seeking information about the FAR in case where the plot size is 104.5Sq.meters. The PIO
has provided the information verbally that