made to run along the common pathway and
thereby shrinking and shortening the width of the common pathway as revealed by
the Advocate Commissioner ... defendants encroached into the
said common pathway to an extent of 1 feet and 2 inches adjoining their plots on
the eastern side. In other
apart for the
common community purpose at the time of plotting out the lands. Therefore, it is
clear that the temple was constructed only ... distribution of prasadams like sacred water and thulasi,
it is common that even in houses, after performing poojas, Hindus used to
distribute prasadams. So, merely
evidence and arrived at the conclusion that
the ABCD portion constituted the common passage for all the parties to the lis.
While holding ... plot. To the west of the houses of the
defendants 1 to 3, KLMN portion is situated which is a common space for the
defendants
plaintiffs, who purchased two plots in the land belonging to Subramania Iyer; that P.W.2 happened to be the common power of attorney ... enlargement of the approval during the year 2005; the plaintiffs purchased two plots during the year 2002 among the plots carved out in Subramania Iyer
defendants in O.S.No.485 of 1995, inveighing the common judgement and decrees dated 15.9.2006 passed by the Principal District Judge, Chengalpattu ... confirming the common judgment and decrees dated 20.1.2004 passed by the Subordinate Judge, Poonamallee
part of
the Government in preferring these appeals. The Government being common to all,
should not view the present claimants/land owners/land losers differently ... Land
Acquisition Act and whether such value for the small plot of land in Ex.P.2
could be taken as the criterion for assessing
earlier batch of appeals,
which were disposed of by this Court vide common judgment dated ... sold for exorbitant price.
There is nothing to show that the house plots were actually sold under the sale
deeds relied on by the claimants
earlier batch of appeals,
which were disposed of by this Court vide common judgment dated ... sold for exorbitant price.
There is nothing to show that the house plots were actually sold under the sale
deeds relied on by the claimants
help of a promoter, the said land was carved out into plots and approval was obtained from the competent authority, namely, the Regional Director ... which the appellant could have no objection.
10. The perusal of the common judgment of the trial Court would display and evince that the trial
Schedule
Plot of land with an extent of 96' North to South and 21' east to west together with the house adjoining ... portion of the A schedule land, excluding the building portion and the common lane of 4' on the eastern portion
