above plot no. 16, common plot was also transferred. Plot no. 16 was admeasuring 154.70 sq.mtr. and common plot was admeasuring ... plot no. 1/10, the other transaction took place on 8.10.86. For both the plots there was a common seller and there is vast difference
draft scheme. Therefore, 30% of the land has
gone towards roads, common plots, etc. as
per the Town Planning Scheme. So far as
Revenue Survey ... land
which would be utilised for the purpose of
road, common plots, etc. under the Town
Planning Scheme and loss of development
charges, it cannot
into the village map. The south boundary of plot No. 440 (plot in question) is common with plot No. 426. The boundary of plot ... awarded in respect of plot Nos. 442 and 443 also. The plot Nos. 441 and 442 have one boundary in common. Therefore, I find sufficient
came to be admitted.
The
instant appeal arises from the common judgment and award rendered by
the reference Court, particularly ... regarding the non-agricultural land
@ Rs.3 per sq.mtr., for common plot @ Rs.2 per sq.mtr. and for open
land
2766/1996 JUDGMENT
to be converted into non-agricultural use, common plot, internal
road and other space is required to be excluded
such sale deeds are of the plots adjacent to the plot in question. Being sale transaction of developed plots of land would at least indicate ... area of plot could be utilised for carving out of plots and the remaining one fourth left out for common purposes, other infrastructure being available
Building vs The State Of Maharashtra on 28 September, 2011
Author: B.P. Dharmadhikari
Bench
Building vs The State Of Maharashtra on 28 September, 2011
Author: B.P. Dharmadhikari
Bench
Ananda Palit Road but a passage of about 10 feet
wide common passage plot in Ext.D is surrounded by bustees/huts. It is
located ... land and does not abut on
Ananda Palit Road but on a common passage of 10 feet wide only and
surrounded by bustees/huts
went wrong in fixing the land
value equally for small plots and larger plots. The
appellants relied on the decision of the Supreme
Court reported ... that, eventhough the acquired lands are larger
plots, it situate among fully developed plots, provided with
common amenities and social developments. Therefore
