respondent. In
fact, this litigation appears to be proxy litigation on behalf of Anil Garg in
whose name the electric connection has been issued ... such, resort in this case has been taken to proxy litigation
who could deny everything.
First Appeal No. 1322 of 2007 6
10. In view
respondent. In fact, this litigation appears to
be proxy litigation on behalf of Anil Garg in whose name the electric
connection has been issued ... such resort in this case has been taken to proxy litigation who
would deny everything."
In Uttar Pradesh Power Corporation Vs. Anis Ahmed (supra
beneficiary of said connection
Instant litigation appearing to be proxy
litigation Complainant is not a consumer
Revision petition dismissed with costs.
fLFkfr
beneficiary of said connection -
Instant litigation appearing to be proxy litigation -
complainant is not a consumer -Revision petition
dismissed with costs.
ekuuh; jk"Vªh
clearly
mandates the requirement of
authorization in matters of proxy litigation.
The complainant gave a go by to this and asserted before the District
Forum
account of litigation charges.
9. I have heard learned proxy counsel for appellant-opposite
party No.1 as none appeared on behalf of the respondent
question and to pay Rs.50,000/- as litigation expenses.
13. Mr. Harsh Sharma, proxy counsel for Mr. Sameer Sethi, learned counsel for respondent
complainant Rs.2,000/- as compensation for harassment
including litigation.
15. Learned proxy Counsel for the Appellant has further argued
that appellant suffered financial loss
service and Rs.50,000/- as cost of litigation.
11. Mr.Gautam Goyal, Advocate learned proxy Counsel for
the Respondents/OPs has argued
Kiran Sibal, Member
Argued by:-
For the appellant : Sh.Simranjeet Singh, proxy for
Sh.T.K.Sharma, Advocate
For the respondents : Ms. Swatantar Kapoor, Advocate ... compensation along with interest and Rs.25,000/- as litigation
expenses.
6. Proxy counsel appeared on behalf of the appellant and stated
that since there