Cyrus Investments Pvt Ltd & Anr vs Tata Sons Ltd & Ors on 21 September
Global Energy Private Limited vs Maharashtra Electricity Regulatory ... on 7 August, 2018
Judgment of Appeal
respondent. In
fact, this litigation appears to be proxy litigation on behalf of Anil Garg in
whose name the electric connection has been issued ... such, resort in this case has been taken to proxy litigation
who could deny everything.
First Appeal No. 1322 of 2007 6
10. In view
personal gain or private
profit either of themselves or as a proxy of others or for any other extraneous motivation or for
glare of publicity ... gives impression about oblique motives involved, and in most cases shows proxy
litigation. Where the petitioner has not even a remote link with the issues
limitation and secondly the question of Section 7 application being a proxy
litigation filed by the Home-buyers as Financial Creditor in class at behest ... accept the settlement of claims is an offshoot of proxy litigation initiated at
the behest of the Jain group which was indirectly controlling the entire
limitation and secondly the question of Section 7 application being a proxy
litigation filed by the Home-buyers as Financial Creditor in class at behest ... accept the settlement of claims is an offshoot of proxy litigation initiated at
the behest of the Jain group which was indirectly controlling the entire
limitation and secondly the question of Section 7 application being a proxy
litigation filed by the Home-buyers as Financial Creditor in class at behest ... accept the settlement of claims is an offshoot of proxy litigation initiated at
the behest of the Jain group which was indirectly controlling the entire
that the present litigation seems to be in the
nature of proxy litigation because the RTI applicant has not demonstrated any
cogent reason for seeking
respondent. In fact, this litigation appears to
be proxy litigation on behalf of Anil Garg in whose name the electric
connection has been issued ... such resort in this case has been taken to proxy litigation who
would deny everything."
In Uttar Pradesh Power Corporation Vs. Anis Ahmed (supra
reply Respondent no. 9 has submitted that the business
rivals initiated proxy litigation against respondent No. 9 by abusing the
O.A No. 306/2022 ... After the failure of the first round of proxy litigation initiated
against respondent No. 9, the business rivals resorted to the present
litigation and filed