which is not significant in so far as this case is
concerned.
13.18. PW.17-Chandraiah, Agriculturist,
deposed that, he is the paternal uncle
getv';:r;la::1;ed 0'
EXs.P.1 to 13.18. Defendalm;.vNollllsgfctVhi:§is'e.lf.v_e;;areinegjs
invalid for violation of Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution."
13.18. Having already observed in para-26, that, by reading the requirement
Prathap Kumar G vs State Of Karnataka on 21 October, 2022
Author: Suraj Govindaraj
Bench
SECTION 153A, 131A, 120B, 122,
123, 124A OF IPC AND UNDER SECTION 13.18,20 OF UNLAWFUL
ACTIVITIES (PREVENTION)ACT.
THIS APPEAL HAVING BEEN HEARD
gross salary was"----.» only
Rs.£/36.000/« as per Ex.8 13.18 and 9.20. 'Efhe e*1f1»l§sI1.~gl::;11
erred
High Court Of Karnataka vs Syed Muneeruddin Mulla on 17 December, 2014
Bench: N.Kumar
Metal Closures Pvt Ltd vs Smt. Muniyamma on 9 April, 2026
Author: Hanchate Sanjeevkumar
Bench
Prabhu vs The State Of Karnataka on 17 March, 2025
Author: Suraj Govindaraj
Bench: Suraj
Judicial Department Multi-Purpose ... vs The State Of Karnataka on 17 April, 2025
Author: Suraj