Once he had not been retrenched, no preference in terms of Section 25H of the I.D. Act can be given to him. Further ... direction to the respondent for his re-employment under Section 25H of the I.D. Act and also to extend the benefit of the above
matter, that in respect of the eight employees, including the petitioners, Section 25H of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, would have to be complied with ... However, while dismissing the writ appeals, this Court had observed that Section 25H of The Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, would be complied with irrespective
Industrial Chemical Ltd. vs Labour Court And Ors. on 14 December, 1976
Equivalent citations: (1977
statutory protection by the aforesaid Act 5 of 1970. Even under Section 25H of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, retrenched employees are entitled to preference ... about to retire. Paragraph 20.12 of the bipartite settlement and Section 25H of the Industrial Disputes Act and Rule 78 of the Industrial Disputes Central
respondents to re-employ the petitioner as Driver as per Section 25H of the Industrial Disputes Act and to extend the benefit ... Once he had not been retrenched, no preference in terms of Section 25H of the I.D. Act can be given to him. Further
members of the petitioners associations are entitled to the benefits of Sec. 25H of the Industrial Disputes Act. After the L.I.C. filed ... such would be entitled to claim the benefits of Secs. 25F, 25H and 25N of the Industrial Disputes Act. It also became necessary
give employment to him as Driver (MT) by adhering to section 25H of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Writ petitioners ... casual drivers were not selected as regular employees. The provisions under section 25H of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, will not apply to the present
educational qualifications etc., they claim that under Section 25H of the Industrial Disputes Act read with Rule 78 of the Industrial Disputes Rules, they ... kept alive until all of them are absorbed permanently;
(iv) Section 25H of the Industrial Disputes Act directly confers right to the appellants under
were given fresh appointment, obviously following the principles laid down in Section 25H of the Industrial Disputes Act. Thereafter the first respondent, namely the Registrar ... petitioners has submitted that when the petitioners were re-employed under Section 25H of the Industrial Disputes Act, there was no justification for the first
Officer, Labour Court, Tirunelveli, 1st Respondent, claiming re-
employment, as per Section 25H of the I.D. Act.
7. The petitioners have further submitted that ... logical corollary would be that in
such an event Section 25H will have no application.
26. The aforementioned provisions clearly carve out a
distinction that
