Disputes Act, 1947 in the matter of violation of Sections 25G and 25H allegedly committed by the employer in employing junior persons without considering ... alleged wrongful termination and also regarding violation of Sections 25G and 25H of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereafter referred
employees relates to the re-employment of the retrenched workmen under Section 25H of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter to be referred ... seniority i.e. to say in accordance with the provisions of Section 25H of the Act. The grievance of the petitioners is that the services
against the provisions contained in Sections 25-G and 25H of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 as the learned Labour Court seriously erred ... retrenched workmen
Interpretation of the expression "retrenched
workmen" in Section 25H - Not restricted
only to the category of retrenched workmen
covered by Section
terminated on 01.01.1994, in violation of provisions of
Sections 25F , 25G and 25H of the Industrial Dispute Act, 1947
(hereinafter to be referred ... provisions under Section 25G ("last
come, first go") and Section 25H of the Act of 1947 were violated,
coupled with the fact
service of petitioner, respondents engaged new person and therefore violation of Section 25H of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (for short ... will be termed as a separate unit and therefore violation of Section 25H of the Act of 1947 is not made out. State Bank
learned tribunal has held that provisions of
Sections 25F , 25G and 25H of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947
(hereinafter the Act) are not applicable ... wherein it was held that
as per provisions of Section 25H of the Act, dispute can be raised
at any time/point. Learned counsel
able to satisfy that there was violation of Sec.25G & 25H of the Act,1947 and even if one has not worked ... preceding 12 months he could invoke the provisions of Sec.25G & 25H of the Act,1947 but looking to the nature of job which
learned Judge of the Tribunal has misdirected himself in applying Section 25H of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Shri Gupta, learned counsel for respondent ... service of the workman, there has been a violation of Section 25H of the 1947 Act, In my considered opinion, the second part
entitled for? Labour Court held that petitioner violated provisions of Section 25H of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and Rules ... reinstatement of the respondent-workman unless there is violation of Section 25H of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and Rules
workmen regarding non-compliance of the provisions of
Sections 25H , 25G or 25N, but still the Tribunal has drawn a
conclusion only on the ground ... Appeal. He also
referred to the non-compliance of Sections 25G and 25H of
the Act of 1947 and submitted that violation is an admitted
