vacant, ought to have been offered to them in terms of Section 25H of the Industrial Disputes Act 1947 (hereinafter referred ... retrenched workman is re-emloyment under the provisions of Section 25H of the Act which runs as follows: -
Where any workmen are retrenched
fill that vacancy. This officer was obviously made in terms of Section 25H of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947). Respondent ... being :
whether K. C. Sud is entitled for re-employment under Section 25H of the Industrial Disputes Act. 1947, as claimed
workman was
entitled to be re-appointed in terms of Section 25H of the Act. After
completion of pleadings before the Tribunal, evidence ... before this court.
Learned counsel for the workman, while referring to Section
25H of the Act, submitted that where any workmen are retrenched
year 2008 after inordinate delay on the ground
that Section 25H of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (for short "the Act")
was violated ... deserves to be answered in
his favour for non-compliance of Section 25H of the Act. The issue
referred to the Tribunal was whether
reinstatement into service on the alleged
preferential right of reinstatement under Section 25H of the Industrial
Civil Writ Petition No.6680 ... been retrenched,
must have been given the preferential right under Section 25H of the
Industrial Disputes Act. A further list of 32 persons, who were
Labour Court, also did not comply with the mandatory provisions of Section 25H of the Act in as much as the workman ... management in the present case to comply with the provisions of Section 25H of the Act before dispensing with the services of the workman
basis which were in violation of provisions of Section 25H of the Industrial Disputes Act. The petitioner raised an industrial dispute which was referred ... raised before the Labour Court, is that the provisions of Section 25H have been violated by appointing private respondents on ad hoc basis
violation of the
mandatory provisions of Sections 25F , 25G and 25H of the Act, the
workman approached the Tribunal, by filing his claim statement under ... petitioner/management has violated the
mandatory provisions of Sections 25F , 25G and 25H of the Act, while
terminating the services of the workman. The observations
considered for re-
employment by virtue of the provisions of Section 25H of the Act.
The respondents submitted a reply to the demand notice ... days but was entitled to the
protection under Section 25G and 25H of the Act. The respondents in
the reply disputed the status
considered for re-employment by virtue of the
provisions of Section 25H of the Act.
The respondents submitted a reply to the demand notice ... days but was entitled to the
protection under Section 25G and 25H of the Act. The respondents in
the reply disputed the status
