Once he had not been retrenched, no preference in terms of Section 25H of the I.D. Act can be given to him. Further ... direction to the respondent for his re-employment under Section 25H of the I.D. Act and also to extend the benefit of the above
respondents to re-employ the petitioner as Driver as per Section 25H of the Industrial Disputes Act and to extend the benefit ... Once he had not been retrenched, no preference in terms of Section 25H of the I.D. Act can be given to him. Further
workmen were terminated without complying with the provisions of Sections 25G and 25H of the Act. The attention of the Court was drawn ... absence of the same, the provisions of Sections 25G and 25H are deemed to be violated. Reliance was also placed on the following judgments rendered
unjustified, the same being not in compliance with Sections 25G and 25H of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred ... services of the workman were terminated in contravention of Sections 25G and 25H of the Act, therefore the termination was illegal and unjustifiable. Accordingly
give employment to him as Driver (MT) by adhering to section 25H of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Writ petitioners ... casual drivers were not selected as regular employees. The provisions under section 25H of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, will not apply to the present
service was illegal since the mandatory provisions of Section 25F , 25G , 25H of the Act read with Rules 76, 77 and 78 of the Industrial ... requisite condition for the application of Section 25F , 25G and 25H of the Act is that there should be retrenchment. Reliance was placed
petitioner and, therefore, according to the labour court, Section 25F , 25G and 25H of the ID Act, 1947 have been violated by the petitioner ... laid down Page 1231 under Section 25G read with Section 25B and 25H of the ID Act, 1947. Apex court has considered that in case
give employment to him as Driver (MT) by adhering to Section 25H of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Writ petitioners ... casual drivers were not selected as regular employees. The provisions under Section 25H of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, will not apply to the present
give employment to him as Driver (MT) by adhering to Section 25H of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Writ petitioners ... casual drivers were not selected as regular employees. The provisions under Section 25H of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, will not apply to the present
absolutely unjustified in holding that in view of the violation of Sections 25H , 25G and 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, the respondent workman ... below are that there was breach of provisions of Sections 25G and 25H of the Act. He however submitted that the Court has found
