Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 117 (0.55 seconds)

Medical vs Dashrathsinh on 10 May, 2011

wage basis by petitioner and thereby petitioner establishment committed breach of section 25H of ID Act, 1947 since no offer was made by petitioner ... necessary to note that being independent provisions of section 25H of ID Act, 1947, as and when in same category if new employee is recruited
Gujarat High Court Cites 45 - Cited by 0 - H K Rathod - Full Document

Ranjit vs Morbi on 7 February, 2011

been proved. However, so far as the alleged breach of section 25H is concerned, the Labour Court found that there was breach of section 25H ... there was no question of following procedure under section 25F , 25G and 25H of the Act. The learned Single Judge therefore, quashed the judgement
Gujarat High Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - J Patel - Full Document

The vs Amarben on 5 November, 2011

error in coming to such conclusion. He also contended that section 25G, 25H have also not been violated by the petitioner and yet finding ... respondents were not called for work by the petitioner and, therefore, section 25H is also violated. After termination of the respondents herein by the petitioner
Gujarat High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - H K Rathod - Full Document

Thakore vs State on 22 July, 2011

while providing work because, otherwise, as per his submission, right under section 25H is also available to the petitioners. He submits that even if their ... daily wager, such retrenched workman will be having legal right under section 25H of the ID Act. Section 25H
Gujarat High Court Cites 4 - Cited by 0 - H K Rathod - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next