Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 4078 (2.26 seconds)

Rajni vs State on 17 August, 2017

chart between Part I and Part II of Section 304 can be represented as under: Section 304 Part I Section 304 Part II Whoever commits ... under Section 304 Part II; while in Kesar Singh (Supra), the conviction was maintained under Section 304 Part I. 33. In the present case
Delhi High Court Cites 17 - Cited by 0 - G S Sistani - Full Document

Gehri Lal & Ors vs State on 8 August, 2017

altered from offence u/s 302 IPC to offence u/s 304 Part-I of IPC because as per allegation of the eyewitnesses who were ... altered from offence u/s 302 IPC to 304 Part-I of IPC . Per contra, learned Public Prosecutor vehemently argued that FIR was registered upon
Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Moni Ram @ Mohan Lal vs State on 9 May, 2017

establish the motive, therefore, offence cannot travel beyond offence under Section 304 Part I IPC . It is also argued that PW--12 Dr. Madan Mohan ... sustainable because offence cannot travel beyond offence under Section 304 Part I IPC because main ingredient of murder is absent. In support of his arguments
Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - G K Vyas - Full Document

Shankar & Anr vs State on 9 November, 2017

part of the accused appellants to kill the deceased. Thus, in our considered opinion, the case does not travel beyond Section 304 Part-I ... 2017 while partly allowing the appeal, convicted the accused-appellant for offence under Section 304 Part-I IPC instead of offence under Section
Rajasthan High Court - Jodhpur Cites 20 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next