Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 746 (2.84 seconds)

R P Meena vs M/O Railways on 22 August, 2019

been recorded that the applicant had not completed 90 days under the reviewing authority which is false as he had worked under the reviewing authority ... Deepak Chhabra) for more than 90 days. This less than 90 days has been calculated by deducting the 3 days LAP deliberately mentioned
Central Administrative Tribunal - Bangalore Cites 0 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Rinku Dhugga vs Home Affairs on 8 August, 2025

2002 was not on duty for at-least 90 days during the period 04,05.2002 to - - - Date not appended . by 31.03.2003 Supervisory authorities ... Period does not exceed 08.04.2004 90 days 0 9 .0 4. 200 4 t o Time Barred Supervisory authorities 22. 0 7. 20 04 recorded
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next