Indian Kanoon - Search engine for Indian Law

under ss.302/34 IPC , ss.25/27 Arms and s.9B Explosives Act and in custody from June 7, 2013 are seeking bail under

120B IPC , ss.25/27 Arms Act and s.9B Explosives Act and in custody from June 1, 2013 is seeking bail under

Arms Act and s.9B Explosives Act are seeking bail under s.438 CrPC. Mr. Mukherjee appearing for the petitioners has submitted as follows

120B IPC, ss. 25/27 Arms Act and s.9B Explosives Act. The prosecution case is supported by eyewitness evidence. The restriction was imposed because

9B Explosive Act and in custody from October 8, 2013 are seeking bail under s.439 CrPC. The court below has refused bail on November

Arms Act and s.9B Explosives Act. For these reasons, we allow the CRAN and order as follows. The restrictive condition is withdrawn. The petitioners

January 9, 2014 under ss.143 / 144 / 341 / 307 IPC, s.9B Explosives Act and ss.25 / 27 Arms Act are seeking bail under ... speak of 2 offence under s.307 IPC or s.9B Explosives Act. Since the falsehood of the case is evident, the petitioners should

Arms Act and s.9B Explosives Act and in custody from December 21, 2012 (the first and third petitioners) and December 25, 2012 (the second

120B IPC , ss.25/27 Arms Act and s.9B Explosives Act and in custody from September 7, 2013 is seeking bail under

Arms Act and s.9B Explosives Act and in custody from October 30, 2013 is seeking bail under s.439 CrPC. The court below