under
ss.302/34 IPC , ss.25/27 Arms and s.9B Explosives Act and in custody from
June 7, 2013 are seeking bail under
120B IPC , ss.25/27 Arms Act and s.9B
Explosives Act and in custody from June 1, 2013 is seeking bail under
9B Explosive Act
and in custody from October 8, 2013 are seeking bail under s.439 CrPC.
The court below has refused bail on November
120B
IPC, ss. 25/27 Arms Act and s.9B Explosives Act. The prosecution case is supported by
eyewitness evidence. The restriction was imposed because
read
with Sections 25 / 27 of the Arms Act and 9B Indian Explosive Act
In the matter of : Urmila Sant & Ors. ... petitioners
Mr. Deep ... with Sections 25 / 27 of the Arms Act and 9B of the Indian Explosive Act which
was registered vide Keshpur P.S. Case
Arms Act and s.9B Explosives Act.
For these reasons, we allow the CRAN and order as follows. The restrictive condition is
withdrawn. The petitioners
Arms Act
and s.9B Explosives Act and in custody from October 30, 2013 is seeking bail
under s.439 CrPC.
The court below
120B IPC , ss.25/27 Arms Act and
s.9B Explosives Act and in custody from September 7, 2013 is seeking bail under
Arms Act
and s.9B Explosives Act and in custody from December 21, 2012 (the first and
third petitioners) and December 25, 2012 (the second
120B IPC ,
ss.25/27 Arms Act and s.9B Explosives Act and in custody from
September 23,2013 is seeking bail under