reliance on thie-"second-- ."'.Article 54 of the
limitation Acti \l'§'hile.Vconsi'dering
Shravanee Properties Pvt Ltd vs State Of Karnataka on 7 February, 2011
Author: B.V
2isio:i_isi of cv;seCtivozis
i47(a} and 348 of the Acti.""7._
Again the Apex Ccmrt céinscif of "Krish
Amendmezlt Acti 2035 and
{}?z€'F%Ef£§f€5. '{1'E€y' Véiféé emified :0 21 share and iharefors
kind
permission or grant viswa~vis ad miitin_g--, acti.vit«y_.V
regulatory authorities have to act.__ with utlmostv, '~care
respondents had not taken any positive acti,on.fftheV'
application was filed before the Tribunal on E4 '
4. T he respondents hereiri
trespasser is not in sottleci
f:i_<)ssossio.r1, aii actis of the: trospasser in
~:*€:ge1;°cl is 1111:: property wili be cvzmsidereci
Tnhes (Prohibition of Transfer of Certain Lands)
Act, 1978 (in shoit PTCL Acti has been committed, the
appellant can rely on law of adverse possessioii
giVe :1' °{.,%a:L.1séT'-~.,o'f.. aCti
PCTS LG CAEL EEE AGCE 1 LOK ATAM A MEG CCH LE
; acti on ata
is
consideration af an o
@
itor could be insane