Armed Forces Tribunal, Principal
Bench, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as 'AFT') in Original
Application 1617/2020 titled Maj. Gen. Jitendra Kumar Shukla ... Court that arguments in the said application were heard by the learned
AFT on 17.12.2021, however, the impugned order was pronounced 21
months thereafter
Radise-Esscon-Aft (Jv) vs Rites Ltd on 7 February, 2024
Author: Jasmeet Singh
Bench: Jasmeet Singh
$~35
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI ... DELHI
+ ARB.P. 178/2024
RADISE-ESSCON-AFT (JV) ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Sajal Goel, Adv.
versus
RITES LTD ..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Balendu Shekhar, Mr. Ravi
Rites Limited vs Radise-Esscon-Aft (Jv) on 21 October, 2024
Author: Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha
Bench: Pamidighantam Sri Narasimha
ITEM NO.49 COURT ... Delhi At New Delhi)
RITES LIMITED Petitioner(s)
VERSUS
RADISE-ESSCON-AFT (JV) Respondent(s)
( IA No.182201/2024-CONDONATION OF DELAY IN FILING
adjudication of main dispute by Armed Forces Tribunal,
Chandigarh (for short 'AFT').
2. The petitioner is working with Indian Air Force ... cannot
be relieved. The petitioner for the redressal of his grievance approached
AFT, which vide order dated 12.01.2024 (Annexure P-2) permitted
Aft Rajiv Gandhi Nagar Kudiyiruppor ... vs Sharatchauhan on 16 August, 2024
Author: D.Krishnakumar
Bench: D.Krishnakumar
Cont ... JUSTICE P.B.BALAJI
Cont.P.No.1180 of 2024
AFT Rajiv Gandhi Nagar Kudiyiruppor Nalachangam
Rep. by its President Rajasekaran
S/o. Somasundaram
Plot
Radise-Esscon-Aft (Jv) vs Rites Ltd on 19 March, 2024
Author: Jasmeet Singh
Bench: Jasmeet Singh
$~64
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI ... DELHI
+ ARB.P. 178/2024
RADISE-ESSCON-AFT (JV) ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Brijesh Kumar Goel, Mr. Rajeev
Kumar and Mr. Sajal Goel, Advs.
versus
RITES
President vs Sushma Krishnamurthy Aft/M. S P ... on 8 February, 2024
Author: N.S.Sanjay Gowda
Bench: N.S.Sanjay Gowda ... PETITIONERS
(BY SRI. MALLIKARJUNSWAMY B. HIREMATH, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. SUSHMA KRISHNAMURTHY AFT/M. S.P. MANDROLI,
AGE. 46 YEARS,
MANJANNA
connected OAs of the petitioners filed before the learned Armed Forces
Tribunal (AFT), Principal Bench, New Delhi.
4. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits ... contention raised on behalf of the petitioners, is that
the learned AFT has agreed with the contentions of the petitioners that their
candidature for admission
order passed by the Armed Forces
Tribunal Principal Bench, New Delhi ('AFT', for short) in MA
No.1214/2024 which is an application ... 2024 wherein the petitioner had sought stay against his discharge.
The AFT had rejected the prayer.
2. In fact, we find that the AFT
Annexure P-1)
passed by the Armed Forces Tribunal, (for short the AFT), Regional
Bench, Chandigarh at Chandigarh, whereby the said respondents were
directed ... petitioner contends that the order
dated 01.11.2022 passed by the AFT, is not being implemented by the
official respondents, despite the fact that
