appointing the 3rd
respondent who secured less marks than the petitioner and below
merit as arbitrary and illegal and against Articles ... written test conducted in which the
petitioner has secured higher marks. However, respondents 1 and 2
have appointed the 3rd respondent as Anganwadi Worker. Aggrieved
illegal arbitrary,
discriminatory and unconstitutional and to further
declare that the respondents are bound to fix different
cut off marks for Cyberabad and Ranga Reddy ... only 1 cut off mark
for both Cyberabad & Ranga Reddy District which
according to them is illegal and arbitrary and has
caused grave injustice
illegal arbitrary,
discriminatory and unconstitutional and to further
declare that the respondents are bound to fix different
cut off marks for Cyberabad and Ranga Reddy ... only 1 cut off mark
for both Cyberabad & Ranga Reddy District which
according to them is illegal and arbitrary and has
caused grave injustice
illegal arbitrary,
discriminatory and unconstitutional and to further
declare that the respondents are bound to fix different
cut off marks for Cyberabad and Ranga Reddy ... only 1 cut off mark
for both Cyberabad & Ranga Reddy District which
according to them is illegal and arbitrary and has
caused grave injustice
illegal arbitrary,
discriminatory and unconstitutional and to further
declare that the respondents are bound to fix different
cut off marks for Cyberabad and Ranga Reddy ... only 1 cut off mark
for both Cyberabad & Ranga Reddy District which
according to them is illegal and arbitrary and has
caused grave injustice
Mandamus,
declaring the action of respondents in granting only 5 marks
instead of 10 marks to the petitioners for their contract labour
service in spite ... earlier
writ petitions as illegal and arbitrary and consequently, to direct
the respondents to grant 10 marks as Service Weightage Marks to
the petitioners
illegal and arbitrary. According to the
petitioner, he is entitled for awarding of 10 marks of service
weightage for past service rendered by the petitioner
marks, as per the G.O.Ms.7, dated 05.02.2022 and also
consequential letter issued by respondent No.1, as illegal and
arbitrary ... petitioner has participated in the selection process and
had secured 41.299 marks in the said examination. It is
submitted that 3% of vacancies were
2018 issued
by the 1st respondent and in not awarding proper marks to her in the
service weightage even though she has rendered her service ... rural
area from 2009 to 2016, as illegal and arbitrary.
2. It is submitted that the petitioner was appointed as Multipurpose
Health Assistant (MPHA
Petition is filed declaring the action of
respondents in not awarding 10 marks for the service rendered
by the petitioner for more than one year ... arbitrary.
2. Sri G.V. Shivaji, learned counsel for the petitioner
submitted that this writ petition is filed seeking weightage of 10
marks for service
