respondents, including the setting of the minimum
qualifying marks, were neither arbitrary nor prejudicial to
the candidates. Rather, these actions were in furtherance ... maximum of 150 marks for the Kannada
language test, the subsequent unilateral fixation of a
minimum of 50 marks as qualifying marks after the
examination
performances, minimum
necessary merit of securing 40 marks being a basic
requirement, cannot be assumed to be arbitrary or illegal.
7. I have given ... after having
been declared unsuccessful. Regarding the contention of
marks being granted in an arbitrary manner during interview,
the allocation of marks in an interview
Sunil G vs State Of Karnataka on 5 March, 2024
Author: K.Somashekar
Bench: K
increasing the marks of senior level National
Championships by 100% and awarding nominal marks for juniors
and the resultant submission is that, marking scheme ... been awarded 10 marks and in the viva-voce, such PG
candidates had been granted either 18 marks or 20 marks
HEREIN
ENCLOSED AND MARKED AS ANNX-A AS BEING MANIFESTLY ILLEGAL,
INVALID, NULL AND VOID, UNJUST, UNFAIR, ARBITRARY, IRRATIONAL
AND VIOLATIVE OF ARTICLE ... dated 13.08.2024
herein enclosed and marked as Annexure-A, as being
manifestly illegal, invalid, null & void, unjust, unfair,
arbitrary, irrational and violative of Article
KIND PERUSAL
OF THIS HON'BLE COURT AND MARKED AS ANNEXURE-R AS
ILLEGAL, ARBITRARY, CAPRICIOUS AND THE SAME IS
APPROVED IN VIOLATION
gets
improvement marks, that would be considered and if one is not
able to get improvement, original marks obtained would be
retained. Therefore ... would lose original
marks or qualification she has obtained. Though on
improvement, the petitioner is issued with fresh marks card in
the year
2019 contends that the select committee
has acted in arbitrary manner in awarding the marks to
the candidates without following any established procedure
or maintaining ... five columns provided under the
heading marks obtained (¥ÀqÉzÀ CAPÀUÀ¼ÀÄ) and a column for
total marks (MlÄÖ CAPÀUÀ¼ÀÄ). Referring to the same
2019 contends that the select committee
has acted in arbitrary manner in awarding the marks to
the candidates without following any established procedure
or maintaining ... five columns provided under the
heading marks obtained (¥ÀqÉzÀ CAPÀUÀ¼ÀÄ) and a column for
total marks (MlÄÖ CAPÀUÀ¼ÀÄ). Referring to the same
MARKED AT ANN-K & THE IMPUGNED
ENDORSEMENT DATED 21.9.12, ISSUED BY THE R4,
MARKED AT ANN-P, AS THE SAME ARE ARBITRARY,
ILLEGAL
