Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 2014 (3.13 seconds)

Kuldeep Singh Yadav vs Municipal Corporation Of Delhi Through ... on 6 May, 2010

endeavour to uphold the impugned order, contend that under provisions of Article 338 of the Constitution of India, the Commission would have jurisdiction to deal ... respondents, as mentioned above, would, however, contend that under Article 338 of the Constitution, the National Commission for Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes has power
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 3 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Dharmendra Kumar vs M/O Railways on 9 July, 2019

2018 Article 341 , the Presidential Orders made under clause (1) thereof acquire an overriding status. But for Articles 341 and 342 of the Constitution ... reservation, vis-à-vis inclusion of castes/tribes. The presence of Articles 338 , 338-A , 341 , 342 in the Constitution clearly precludes that
Central Administrative Tribunal - Jabalpur Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Mrsultan Singh vs Gnctd on 20 August, 2015

made observations repelling the  contention that under  Article 341  of the Constitution the president was not authorised to limit  the notification to parts of a State ... Castes   as   ordered   by   the  President under the Constitutional authority.  18.   Article 338(9)  of the Constitution says the Union and every State Government shall
Central Information Commission Cites 15 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

S.R. Samuel vs Union Of India on 21 March, 2011

under powers conferred by sub-clause (f) of Clause 5 of Article 338 A of the Constitution of India. He would contend that it would ... these rules that the NCST is not controlled by the Government. Article 338 A, inter alia, reads thus: "338 A. National Commission for Scheduled
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next