subjected to any urine test, blood test, or breath analysis to confirm
alcohol consumption. Further, no person from the vicinity complained
that the petitioner consumed ... public road. Added to it, no
breath analysis test, urine test, or blood test conducted to confirm that the
petitioner was in a drunken state
received a blood smeared cloth and samples of semen from
one Muthumala, Police Constable. He sent the blood smeared cloth to the
Forensic Science Laboratory ... Hospital for conducting scan and blood test and thereafter, handed over her
to the Home.
4.10. P.W.11 – Samuthirapandi, Special Sub-Inspector of Police
argued on the side of the petitioner that the blood test report
produced by the prosecution is full of interpolations and raises serious doubts
about ... 81249 that the petitioner
consumed liquor, but not under influence. The blood test and urine test reflect
that ethyl alcohol is beyond the permissible limit
argued on the side of the petitioner that the blood test report
produced by the prosecution is full of interpolations and raises serious doubts
about ... 81249 that the petitioner
consumed liquor, but not under influence. The blood test and urine test reflect
that ethyl alcohol is beyond the permissible limit
detonators,
MO60 Card Board Box, Exs.P7 & P8 the blood test report of Bakkiyaraj
and Ex.P9 a Kumudam Reporter issue were ... also
examined the blood test report of Bakkiaraj found in the house of A3.
Further, PW64 examined PW36, PW37/Head Constables who took
samples
petitioner. On 26.07.2007, the brother-in-law of PW2 had
given blood for the surgery. On that day, PW2 met the accused enquired about ... During the treatment, she was
taken X-Ray, blood test and scan.
(ii)The dispute is with regard to the date, on which the alleged
eIitia is suspected CT scan, NMR EEG, Lumbar puncture
.aI1Fd blood test wiii be carried out. He further stated that
53
dementia cannot be diagnosed
drunkness, it was
recorded that the appellant refused to undergo blood test and urinary test to
confirm the presence of alcohol in his body ... appellant is rejected. The appellant refused to give his blood and urine
samples for test, hence adverse inference to be taken. Added
petitioner is not proper and the petitioner
was not subjected to blood test to prove the same. The trial Court had merely
Page
Court declining to entertain the request of the
petitioner for DNA blood test.
3
2. The petitioner-wife has filed petition under
Section ... Court to put himself and the
minor children to DNA blood test to prove the paternity.
4. The Family Court was of the view that
