Section 164A in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
description of material taken from the person of the woman for DNA profiling; (iv) marks of injury, if any, on the person of the woman
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 36901 (3.40 seconds)Manoj Pratap Singh vs The State Of Rajasthan on 24 June, 2022
fourth
being the report of the Forensic Science Laboratory, particularly on DNA
matching.
8.1. In the post-mortem report (Ex. P-35), the nature ... also usefully extract the relevant parts of the report of
DNA examination carried out by the State Forensic Science Laboratory,
Rajasthan, Jaipur (that was drawn
Section 53A in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
description of material taken from the person of the accused for DNA profiling, and (v) other material particulars in reasonable detail. (3) The report shall
Section 53 in The Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 [Entire Act]
finger nail clipping by the use of modern and scientific techniques including DNA profiling and such other tests which the registered medical practitioner thinks necessary
In Reference vs Vinod @ Rahul Chouhatha on 8 August, 2018
Bhagwan Das and another vs.
State of Rajasthan).
A DNA report must be accepted as scientifically accurate and is an exact
science. It would ... Santosh Kumar Singh vs.
State through CBI).
A positive result of DNA test would constitute clinching evidence against the
accused. If, however, result of test
Sunil Kumar @ Sonu vs State Of H.P on 15 July, 2015
blood samples of prosecutrix as well
as her newly born child for DNA profiling. It is further alleged
by prosecution that ... Medical
Superintendent Zonal Hospital Mandi for preserving blood
sample of accused and DNA profiling. It is further alleged by
prosecution that investigating officer moved application
Ankush Maruti Shinde . vs State Of Maharashtra on 5 March, 2019
learned counsel appearing on behalf of
the accused that, in fact, the DNA, finger print evidence and the initial
identification made by the victim contradict ... submitted that there are no recoveries, finger print evidence, CA
evidence or DNA evidence linking the accused to the crime.
5.4 It is vehemently submitted
Nandlal Wasudeo Badwaik vs Lata Nandlal Badwaik & Anr on 6 January, 2014
child. The petitioner had
also applied for referring the child for DNA test, which was
refused. It is against the said order of refusal that ... present Special Leave was filed and the same prayer for
conducting the DNA test was made before us. On 8th November,
2010 we had accordingly
P.Rajagopal And Ors. Etc. vs The State Of Tamil Nadu on 29 March, 2019
basis of
a superimposition test was improper, in the absence of a DNA test.
Per contra, Shri Balaji Srinivasan, the learned Additional
Advocate General appearing ... deposed by them.
31. Shri Sushil Kumar also argued that a DNA test should have
been conducted in order to identify the dead body
Bhabani Prasad Jena Etc vs Convenr.Sec.Orissa S.Comn.For ... on 3 August, 2010
Court of
Orissa was justified in issuing direction for deoxyribonucleic acid
test (DNA) of the child and the appellant who, according to the
mother ... passed by the State Commission
but clarified that directions regarding maintenance and DNA are
not stayed.
6. On August 7, 2009, the High Court took