petitioner was sent home.
12. Required to be placed before the DIG, BSF, on January 08, 2003, the
penalty was set aside for the reason ... another unit.
13. But by then, i.e. when the DIG BSF passed the order on January 08,
2003, neither was Dy.Commandant
BSF was attached with 105
Battalion BSF on disciplinary grounds. In compliance to above order CT
Harphool Kumawat arrived in 105 Bn BSF ... February 22, 2011. (Exhibit-K & L)
(ii) The DIG, BSF, Berhampur forwarded the vigilance case report of
depositing the excess money
BSF in the year 1988. In
the year 2011 while the petitioner was posted at 52nd Bn. BSF at Indo
Bangladesh Border, the DIG BSF
SSFC), the order dated November 20, 1998
passed by the DIG, BSF HQ, Gurdaspur confirming the same as well as the
order dated September ... Competent Authority, namely the DIG
W.P.(C) No.6426/2000 Page 9 of 11
BSF Barmer who, vide communication dated May 10, 1996 opined
BSTT
Branch. It says that as per the approval
given by DIG, BSF, Gujarat, on the note-
sheets dated 27th June, 1983, call letters
were
Sanatan Bauri -vs- DIG, BSF & Ors.)
Mr. Lal Ratan Mondal
Mr. Haradhan Mondal
......for the petitioner.
The matter is an old one and appearing
Border
Security Force (BSF) seeking information on three points relating to Shri Sunil Chandra Roy,
Subedar, BSF including (i) photocopies of all certificates (Employment Exchange ... hearing through video conferencing.
The respondent Shri Ajmal Singh, CPIO and DIG, BSF was present in person.
4. The appellant submitted that no information
Medtacity, Jila Nagour Rajasthan
Respondent : Central Public Information Officer,
HQ Rajasthan Frontier BSF,
Mandore Road
Jodhpur, Rajasthan
Date of Hearing : 30.11.2015
Relevant dates emerging from ... Prajapat was present in person. The respondent Shri S.C
Yadav, DIG, BSF attended the hearing through video conferencing.
4. The appellant submitted that complete
before the Central Public Information Officer (CPIO), HQ Rajasthan Frontier BSF Directorate
General Border Security Force, (Pers Dte: Rectt Section), seeking information on fourteen points ... Kumar was not present despite notice. The respondent Shri
Ajmal Singh, DIG, BSF attended the audio hearing.
4. The respondent submitted that BSF has been
officers and men of 132
BN, BSF, and whether Shri Dilbagh Singh Assistant Commandant 132 BN, BSF and Subedar Shri
Surrender Singh Negi were awarded ... hearing through video conferencing. The
respondent Shri Ajmal Singh, CPIO and DIG, BSF was present in person.
4. The appellant submitted that no information
