Pinky Khatoon @ Begum vs The State Of West Bengal on 3 February, 2023
Exhibit 10. The report states that, from the pattern of funding
it appeared that the burning body remained stationary under
the shelf. No sign
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 112 (0.80 seconds)Acting Through Mr. Binay Kumar vs . on 25 October, 2019
manner explained above. In
other words, the analysis of consumption pattern can
only corroborate what is found on physical inspection
which can indicate whether ... reason for burning the subject meter and as per
crossexamination of CW02, he had not compared the
consumption pattern of preinspection period
Brpl vs . Manil Kumar Vats Page No. 1 Of 15 on 20 December, 2022
abnormally
burnt and what are the parameters for consituting burning of a
meter as abnormally burning. Even the speaking order ... complainant. Even
consumption pattern pertains to till the month of February 2016
i.e. one month prior to date of burning of meter. No subsequent
State vs . Ravinder Nath on 15 December, 2018
breaking of seals, tampering of
meter and burning of CT Meter etc. The consumption pattern was also
analyzed on the basis of connected load found
Complainant vs Ved Prakash on 30 July, 2014
There is nothing in the report that burning of input
phase terminal can affect the consumption pattern of the meter. The
laboratory report without ... pattern
but it is reflected in the speaking order Ex PW2/C. The said
consumption pattern is not placed on record. The consumption pattern
Om Prakash vs State Of Punjab on 5 October, 2012
Om Prakash vs State Of Punjab on 5 October, 2012
1
IN THE COURT OF
Tata PowerDdl vs . Abdul Kadir on 13 November, 2018
that
there is no burning of said meter at the site.
7. The complainant has also relied upon the consumption
pattern analysis sheet which
Union Territory vs Ravinder Singh on 20 October, 2011
distance. A perusal of the
post-mortem report shows that the muzzle pattern was not found on
the target. In case the firearm had been ... usually observed in suicide cases. Since in the
present case muzzle pattern was not observed by the doctor during
post-mortem examination at the target
Union Territory vs Ravinder Singh on 20 October, 2011
distance. A perusal of the
post-mortem report shows that the muzzle pattern was not found on
the target. In case the firearm had been ... usually observed in suicide cases. Since in the
present case muzzle pattern was not observed by the doctor during
post-mortem examination at the target
Through Shri Binay Kumar vs . on 21 December, 2018
hearing.
Thereafter, on the basis of inspection report, lab report
and consumption pattern for the period of last one year as well as
considering other ... exhibited
as EX. CW2/10. He had also compared the consumption pattern
of new meter with the old removed meter and the consumption