Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 164 (0.69 seconds)

Acting Through Mr. Binay Kumar vs . on 25 October, 2019

manner explained above. In other words, the analysis of consumption pattern can only corroborate what is found on physical inspection which can indicate whether ... reason for burning the subject meter and as per cross­examination of CW02, he had not compared the consumption pattern of pre­inspection period
Delhi District Court Cites 9 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

R.L.Srinivasan vs Union Of India on 24 July, 2019

area to its previous pristine state, including restoration of mangroves, drainage pattern. 3. Alleging violations committed by North Chennai Thermal Power Station, second respondent herein ... respectively. 4. Petitioner states that Thermal plant generates electricity by burning coal. It is stated that ash generated in the process of generating electricity
Madras High Court Cites 36 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . Parmod Rathee on 8 April, 2019

established on record by the accused that he lodged a report regarding burning of his meter on 04.05.2015 vide Ex.DW2/A wherein ... cross examination has admitted that they have not analyzed the consumption pattern and MDI of the previous meter. Therefore, it can not be believed that
Delhi District Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next