Ref: Case No. 25/2010, 41/2010, ... vs .£33 U?" £~':S5=..Ig1"M'1E':Nt 0'? ... on 16 February, 2012
Ref: Case No. 25/2010, 41/2010, ... vs .£33 U?" £~':S5=..Ig1"
Search Results Page
Did you search for
CESE
Search Results
1 - 10 of 20 (0.96 seconds)Raj Kumar Makhija And Others vs M/S S.K.S. And Co. And Othrs on 7 August, 2012
deminimis rule to such a case. As to what is a cese deserving the benefit of the aforesaid rules is a question the benefit
Sunil Kumar Shaw vs The Chairman on 10 April, 2012
premises. The police are in no way involved in the lis
between CESE and the petitioner. Hence there is no reason for this Court
Sri J R Srinivas vs Sree Gururaja Enterprises P Ltd on 20 March, 2012
brief and
epply its mind to the facts of the cese and other
"material on record, keeping in mind the law laid
down
State By Sakaleshapura Rural Police ... vs Dharma @ Dharmesha S/O Byraiah on 5 October, 2012
State By Sakaleshapura Rural Police ... vs Dharma @ Dharmesha S/O Byraiah on 5 October, 2012
Jay Prakash Rawat vs The Chairman on 17 May, 2012
dated May 13, 2010 is quoted
below:
"None appears for the CESE Ltd. and/or its officers. Affidavit-of-Service filed in Court
today
Sri J Perumal @ J Perumal Naidu vs Sri J Venkatesan S/O M Jayaram Naidu on 29 March, 2012
filed by the petitioner and respondent No.4 to club both
the ceses: and: permit them to lead common evidence.
'Under the impugned order
H.B.Siddesha @ Siddu vs State By Banavara Police on 13 March, 2012
wducted we AW. 16 i of me evell bo the cese of the
have rit stated soout tre comoexion, their ¢
anc other reevant cetals
K B Somanna vs Javarayigowda on 21 March, 2012
suit was not maintainable?"
6. In the admitted facts of the cese that "the
respondent Javarayigowda was i possession of the sunt :
achedule
Manjunatha @ Raja vs State Of Karnataka on 9 February, 2012
serious "allegation made
against this accused, it. 12, not ¢ a ft cese for enlarging the
accuser Or. bail.
4. _Aecondivgty, the petition is dismissed