Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 38 (0.68 seconds)

Mrsuresh Chandra Sharma vs Cbi on 15 July, 2016

deny information  regarding the date on which the mobile in question was received in the CFSL as the same  would have no bearing ... provide  information regarding the date on which the mobile in question was received in the CFSL  within a period of two weeks from the date
Central Information Commission Cites 1 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Yogendra Mittal vs M/O Finance on 3 July, 2024

Serial No. 8501868 in the name of Sh. Surinder Kumar, pertaining to mobile no. 9650890005 alongwith supporting documents (Page ... Letter no. 1045 dated 23.04.2013 to Director CFSL, New Delhi (Pages 1-4) 27. Letter no. 1046 dated 23.04.2013 to Director CFSL, New Delhi.(Pages
Central Administrative Tribunal - Delhi Cites 16 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Rupinder Singh Chaddha vs New Delhi(Icd Tkd) on 3 June, 2025

both Rupinder Singh Chaddha and C.K. Jain were sent to CFSL, Chandigarh for forensic examination on 20.09.2013, but it was informed that the case ... apparent that there was frequent interaction between mobile number 9899666641 of Rupinder Singh Chaddha and another mobile number 8860940298, which, as per the Truecaller website
Custom, Excise & Service Tax Tribunal Cites 18 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

Manali Malik & Ors. vs Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. on 24 May, 2016

from personal search. One car NO. DL-4CNA-0738 (Pajero) and one Mobile No.9810163229 were also seized from road-side, which also belonged ... handed over       to relatives of deceased.  The viscera was sent          to CFSL Hyderabad on 20.03.2007 for chemical examination. On 14.08.2009 chemical analysis     report was received
National Consumer Disputes Redressal Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 4 Next