Food Inspector Sh Arun Kumar purchased a sample of food color
viz. Caramel (Acid proof) from appellant Rattan Kumar at M/s. Thakur
Brothers ... Analyst for analysis in intact condition. Public Analyst found
the sample of caramel (acid proof) content conforming to the
standards. However, there was violation
cwmmr
was gamma LTD reported in
caramel mntarfled that, the
ta-avian'!
a matwial error and an fllgaliiy,
an-ur-I
said
appears
the petitioners have filed these two peiitiims.
Heard the caramel for the petitioners and Sri
learned Sr. Counsel fer the respondent
wflt he oomtruad as an
w unm seem" 10:» 0f the Caramel' '
. Code? as stzch, $1 cannat he sustained.
" § pasa
Ciaurt ziefisn;-'med tha fialbwing:
beamed Caramel for
fin' dhmfaaal of appeal
éhrough their caramel.
"§'"he:"efs;*e ," §V%3fe{fer§;:r:#'e~ Gear: in the saéd specific
finding
fisagative
.m
'fix § Senior Caramel
' ffir ms mnmmtm mt Triai cam; has
mdim firm: Sim bvsaring I'~1:::.35
ms 'fifmt
order of
eumvznmo' ' 21 ma!' Court.
3?'. As Caramel for the nmpumiua.-nt
is a. money liar while
he has taknn
isaaraw Caramel mfmfizgm Ruk 14-(A) Qrxtlezr
ITII '$'$'HI\I VI
% mmmég that appm £5 mt k in view
mmidm the sang. I decline to accept V'
the iearnead caramel for the
poaifiuen 91' my that the plea
posaeaaiwn ought
