State vs . Dharamendra Kumar Tandan Judgement ... on 4 September, 2017
State vs . Dharamendra Kumar Tandan Judgement ... on 4 September, 2017
State Vs. Dharamendra Kumar Tandan
Search Results Page
Search Results
1 - 10 of 6171 (2.69 seconds)Vikas Sharma vs State Of H.P on 18 April, 2015
prosecution. Though the case property was also
sealed with seals of FSL but the possibility of the case property being
tampered with cannot be ruled ... three seals were broken. But, in the instant case, six seals were found
broken immediately after the receipt of the case property from FSL,
Junga
State vs Deepak @ Deepu on 21 December, 2024
State vs Deepak @ Deepu on 21 December, 2024
IN THE COURT OF MS. AMBIKA SINGH
State vs Reena on 25 April, 2025
State vs Reena on 25 April, 2025
DLSH010011882018 Page 1 of 57
SC No.81
State vs Sakawat Etc on 31 October, 2025
Parcel No.2 sealed with the seal of Court. Seals are broken
and the case property i.e one country made pistol and two empty ... Parcel No3 sealed with the seal of Court. Seals are broken
and the case property i.e country made pistol and country made
pistol live
Title Of The Case: : State vs . Mukesh on 10 April, 2023
that the
case property i.e. one quarter bottled from each pattie and the remaining case
property was sealed with the seal of PS however ... case property and same was Ex. P-1 and at the time of production of case property,
the same was bearing a broken seal
Kuldeep Singh S/O Major Singh vs The State Of Punjab on 1 December, 2008
cross-examination, stated
that some of seals, on the case property were lying broken, and were not
clearly matching with the seals affixed ... possible to properly stack the case property of all
the cases. If due to mis-handling of the case property, or during the
course
Dhanna Singh S/O Pirthi Singh vs The State Of Punjab on 31 July, 2008
case properties of so many other
cases, are also kept. On account of shortage of space, in the malkhanas, the
case properties of the cases ... broken. Even, on account of
irresponsible handling of the case property, the seals get broken. The only
obligation upon the prosecution is to produce
Surjeet Singh And Anr vs State Of Haryana on 12 November, 2014
next argued that when the case
property was produced in the Court, some seals were found broken.
Learned counsel for the appellants further contended that ... present
case, case property is produced in the Court and if due to gap of time,
some seals on the case property are broken
Hari Singh Son Of Risal Singh vs State Of Haryana on 3 February, 2010
case. It was the duty of the
Incharge, Malkhana, to keep the case property, in safe custody. The
mere fact, that the case property ... explain, as to at what point of time, the seals stood broken. The case
property, therefore, did not stand connected with the case. This also