Interim
Order merges into the final Order and the Interim Order (including
all directions thereunder) automatically cease to operate;
A(iii) - Contempt Petition ... contempt petition praying
for initiation of contempt proceeding was filed by the contemnor
during the period that is 23.09.2014 to 21.11.2014, when the
interim order
appears that the contempt petition was filed on 22-04-2015. But
even before the Contempt petition came up for admission, the
Administrative Tribunal passed ... contempt petition and a notice before admission was
ordered in Contempt petition on 8-6-2015. On 4-9-2015 the
contempt petition was admitted
said
investors are putting up their claims.
Various transferred cases, interim applications,
contempt petition as well as the writ petition are pending in
this Court ... pass appropriate orders.
All the matters i.e. transferred cases, interim
applications, contempt petition as well as the writ petition are
W.P.(C) 1399
both petitions
Vs.
G.Jayaprakesh ... Respondent/Petitioner
in both petitions
COMMON PRAYER : Contempt Petition filed under Section 19(1) of Contempt of
Courts Act, praying ... challenged before us is only the
interim orders, in the pending contempt petitions. Interim orders have been
merged in the orders passed in the main
SANKAR PATRO AND ORS Respondent(s)
(with interim relief and office report)
(For Final Disposal)
WITH
SLP(C) No. 35793-35796/2012
(With appln ... documents and appln.(s) for
application for permission to file contempt petition and interim
relief and office report)
SLP(C) No. 37028/2012
(With Interim
disposed of vide
order dated 10.07.2014 and all the interim orders passed in
that contempt petition stand merged in the final order, supra.
1
Whether ... another
contempt petition for the same relief, which was diarized as
.
COPC No. 285 of 2014. This Court disposed of the said
contempt petition vide
Court has dismissed
the application on the ground that the contempt petition qua interim injunction
is stated to be pending which had not been complied
Jatav vs S.B.Sharma on 16 November, 2016
Contempt Appeal No.1/2016
16.11.2016
Shri M.P.S. Raghuvanshi, counsel for the
appellant.
Heard ... dated
21.05.2015. Thereafter, the respondent No.1 has
moved a contempt petition stating that interim order
was not followed and, therefore, the appellant was
punished
which interim relief was
granted to the petitioner on 07.02.2013, has been disposed
of in terms of order dated 18.03.2016.
In this contempt petition, vague ... obstructing the
road line within the Corporation limits.
Writ petition shall remain connected to Contempt
Case No.913/2014, in view of the above order
this Petition.
25 WP No. 1150 of 2015 and Contempt Petition No. 6 of 2015
(now re-numbered as Contempt Petition ... Bench, (subsequently renumbered as WP No.
2486 of 2015). On 23 March 2015, WP No. 222 of 2015 and WP No.
23/165
::: Uploaded
