DAR case against Shri Ashwin Shukla
b) Certified copy of the vigilance investigation report which led to
the DAR action on Shri Ashwin Shukla.
Page ... organizations and other documents regarding vigilance
investigations which led to the DAR action on Shri Ashwin Shukla.
d) Certified copy of all notings and correspondence
00519/2018/CAT/Bangalore Bench
per rules. Accordingly, the DAR action was initiated by the DA. In terms of para
313.3 of IRVM, when regular ... such regular departmental action. Hence, the
recommendation by vigilance to initiate DAR action against the applicant is in
order and DAR action initiated
correct procedure
and the same is as per rules. Accordingly, the DAR action was initiated by the
DA. In terms of para 313.3 of IRVM ... such regular departmental action.
Hence the recommendation by vigilance to initiate DAR action against the
applicant is in order and DAR action initiated
member is
required/detailed for special duty, under transfer order, facing
DAR action and avoiding to attend departmental enquiry or is
habitual of reporting sick
caused the rear
and collision.
6
4.1 Based on CRS enquiry, DAR action was taken against
the applicant by issuing SF-5 dated 19.11.2004, which
said memorandum dated 06.12.2018 reads as under:-
"Sub: DAR action against Shri Ajmer Singh, TTE/ADI under Rule 14(1) of Railway
Servants ... rules and delegation, Sr. DCM
is the competent Authority to initiate action under DAR Rule 14 (1), if in his assessment
conditions so warranted. Accordingly
vacation or date of eviction
whichever is earlier, along with other actions like imposition
of minor penalty etc. On verification of the records ... even though Sr.DME/PGT being the
disciplinary authority has taken DAR action, as directed by
the Vigilance Branch, no recovery was made from your
information on various points,
including, inter-alia: (i) what are the DAR action pending against the
appellant; and (ii) status of his attendance
seeking information on various points,
including, inter-alia: (i) whether any DAR action pending against the
appellant; and (ii) status of his attendance
applicant. Same were apprised to the respondent No.4 to
take DAR action against the Union people but he did not take any action.
Instead
