Rajasthan.
----Petitioners
Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan Through Secretary, Devasthan
Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Land Acquisition Officer And Sub-Divisional Magistrate,
Danta Ramgarh, Distt
respondents herein, had no locus standi to file the
complaints before the Devasthan Department, as per the scheme
of the Act of 1959, discussed above ... 2016]
B) That the learned Commissioner, Devasthan Department,
wrongly placed the burden of proof upon the petitioners herein,
for establishing the mode of succession
respondents herein, had no locus standi to file the
complaints before the Devasthan Department, as per the scheme
of the Act of 1959, discussed above ... 2016]
B) That the learned Commissioner, Devasthan Department,
wrongly placed the burden of proof upon the petitioners herein,
for establishing the mode of succession
respondents herein, had no locus standi to file the
complaints before the Devasthan Department, as per the scheme
of the Act of 1959, discussed above ... 2016]
B) That the learned Commissioner, Devasthan Department,
wrongly placed the burden of proof upon the petitioners herein,
for establishing the mode of succession
respondents herein, had no locus standi to file the
complaints before the Devasthan Department, as per the scheme
of the Act of 1959, discussed above ... 2016]
B) That the learned Commissioner, Devasthan Department,
wrongly placed the burden of proof upon the petitioners herein,
for establishing the mode of succession
respondents herein, had no locus standi to file the
complaints before the Devasthan Department, as per the scheme
of the Act of 1959, discussed above ... 2016]
B) That the learned Commissioner, Devasthan Department,
wrongly placed the burden of proof upon the petitioners herein,
for establishing the mode of succession
respondents herein, had no locus standi to file the
complaints before the Devasthan Department, as per the scheme
of the Act of 1959, discussed above ... 2016]
B) That the learned Commissioner, Devasthan Department,
wrongly placed the burden of proof upon the petitioners herein,
for establishing the mode of succession
respondents herein, had no locus standi to file the
complaints before the Devasthan Department, as per the scheme
of the Act of 1959, discussed above ... 2016]
B) That the learned Commissioner, Devasthan Department,
wrongly placed the burden of proof upon the petitioners herein,
for establishing the mode of succession
remains a nullity."
6. Per contra, learned counsel for respondents representing
Devasthan Vibhag submits that as per Section 31 of the Public Trust ... lease, for a period exceeding five years
in the case of agricultural land orfor a period exceeding
three years in the case of non-agricultural
