case was that the lands in suit were really Devasthan lands given to the defendants Devlis and Bhavnis for the services which they rendered ... alienate the lands. It was apparently common ground in the lower Court that if it was found that these lands were Devasthan property, the alienation
certificate to declare that the suit
land was the Devasthan Inam land of Shri
Dey Chavata. The certificate given by the
Assistant Charity Commissioner ... that the suit
land was his private property but the Assistant Charity Commissioner declared
that the suit land was the Devasthan Inam
land of Shri
also, these lands are entered to be the class III Devasthan Inam lands.
Further, the petitioner trust has also produced on record the copy ... 2016.odt
declared these lands as Class III Devasthan Inam lands, they were
already exempted from the provisions of section 32G of the said
also, these lands are entered to be the class III Devasthan Inam lands.
Further, the petitioner trust has also produced on record the copy ... 2016.odt
declared these lands as Class III Devasthan Inam lands, they were
already exempted from the provisions of section 32G of the said
suit land as on the
date of suit?
3) Whether the defendant No.1 proves that, the suit land is
"Devasthan Inam Land ... endorsement does not disclose that land in sy. No. 161 as an inam
land. On the other hand land
land' or acquisition of title by adverse possession. It
was averred that ''The disputed land'' belongs to 'Devasthan ... well established that
'The disputed land' was recorded as 'Mufai Devasthan' and that a
'Math', a 'Chhatri
lands described in the plaint by previous managers were void and that the lands were of the ownership of the Devasthan and for a declaration ... lands by the Government should be paid to the plaintiff and after the land was vacated possession should be delivered to the Devasthan
benefit of the Devasthan and hence not binding on the
devasthan; the, purchasers' possession over the land sold
was therefore void and adverse ... benefit of the
Devasthan. It was, therefore, held to be not binding on the
Devasthan. Then purchasers'possession over the land sold
was, therefore
sale-deeds of the suit lands were void and the lands were of the ownership of Shree Mahadoba Devasthan, and two, that the plaintiff ... expenses of the festival of God Shree Mahadoba-Devasthan at Monjo Theur, Kasba Poona. The lands were granted with two-fold Sardcshmukhi rights both
comprised under Article 26 , read with Article 250 of the Devasthan Regulations disclose that the General Body has to deliberate upon the appeal filed ... provisions of the Land Acquisition Act . Undoubtedly, the provisions of the Land Acquisition Act are different from those under the Devasthan Regulations. But the decision
