Search Results Page

Search Results

1 - 10 of 29 (0.79 seconds)

__________________________________________________________ vs State Of Himachal Pradesh on 3 August, 2017

amplified products along with controls wee run on automated DNA sequencer (ABI 3130). DNA profiles were prepared and analysis was carried out using Gene Mapper ... sample, Kuldeep Chand). 2. Exhibit-2 (salwar,......{the prosecutrix}) yielded highly degraded DNA that did not show amplification with Powerplex 21® PCR Amplification
Himachal Pradesh High Court Cites 10 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs . Ashish @ Nirmal Etc. on 4 March, 2017

connection with the DNA examination in the present case stating that in the present case DNA profiling/examination, result were not coming from the exhibits ... used another kit (Mini Filer) by which even DNA could be generated from degraded sample and submitted the report on the basis of the same
Delhi District Court Cites 8 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs Anwar on 23 September, 2017

were subjected to DNA isolation, but   DNA   could   not   be   isolated   from   shirt   and   baniyan   of   the injured due to degradation and he gave ... accused but the DNA could not be isolated from the shirt and baniyan of the victim due to degradation. From both set of FSL result
Delhi District Court Cites 5 - Cited by 0 - Full Document

State vs Sumit Kumar Bhatia 1 Of 17 on 28 August, 2017

prosecutrix. 43. But, as per the DNA report Ex.PW18/A, the DNA could not be isolated from the source of exhibits S1 (strands ... again   no   DNA   could   not   isolated   from   the   exhibits   due   to inhibitors/degradation. 45. In   these   circumstances,   it   cannot   be   concluded   that   the semen detected
Delhi District Court Cites 6 - Cited by 0 - Full Document
1   2 3 Next