loci and
amelogemin with Powerplex 21® PCR Amplification Kit.
2. The DNA isolated from Exhbit-1b (pajami, prosecutrix),
Exhibit-2 (perineal swab, prosecutrix), Exhibit-5 (high ... prosecutrix), Exhibit-7a (blood sample prosecutrix) and
Exhibit-10 (bedsheet) slightly degraded DNA, however it was
possible to amplify all the twenty autosomal STR loci
amplified products along with controls wee run on
automated DNA sequencer (ABI 3130). DNA profiles
were prepared and analysis was carried out using Gene
Mapper ... sample, Kuldeep Chand).
2. Exhibit-2 (salwar,......{the prosecutrix}) yielded
highly degraded DNA that did not show amplification
with Powerplex 21® PCR Amplification
male DNA generated therefrom could therefore not be
connected with the DNA generated from the blood of the appellant due to
inhibition/degradation of DNA
sample of the fetus degraded and no DNA profile
could be generated from the sample. Victim admitted
in her cross examination that
delay of 25 days of the alleged date of
occurrence. The DNA report does not suggest that the rape was committed
upon the prosecutrix ... this Court.
However, he submits that the DNA could not be matched, it being degraded.
I have heard learned counsel for the parties.
Considering
examination was found degraded on two occasions
and even on third occasion the DNA profile of accused of no use because DNA
profile ... could not be examined as the
same was found degraded on two occasions and the DNA profile of accused
done on third occasion
accused persons as samples taken from them
were degraded and did not generate DNA profile. Secondly, in absence of supporting
testimony from prosecutrix, her parents
from Assistant Director, FSL, Rohini that
DNA profile of the petitioner could not be generated due to
degradation / inhibition and therefore, fresh blood sample ... blood sample of the petitioner as
DNA profile of the petitioner could not be generated due to
degradation / inhibition. He submitted that blood sample cannot
State vs Manish Kumar & Anr. Fir No.557/16 Ps ... on 26 November, 2018
victim. The female DNA was matched from the source of
exhibit i.e. skirt of victim. Male DNA was generated from the source of exhibit ... male DNA i.e. of Vikas or Rakesh. DNA could
not be generated from the blood of accused Johnson or Deepak due to degradation